What do we know about California's Climate Disclosure Laws?
Posted by Greer McNally on
Topics: Sustainability, Regulations
Posted by Greer McNally on
Topics: Sustainability, Regulations
In October 2023, California announced new legislation for reporting on carbon emissions. Learn what is involved in this legislation and how to begin preparing.
Never before has climate-related legislation been such an important feature of the business environment. California is taking the lead in the USA, passing new legislation with more stringent reporting requirements than comparative states. In October 2023, California promulgated new disclosure laws, which in a nutshell will require two types of reporting from applicable companies (except insurance providers) doing business in the state.
The first of the California climate disclosure bills is the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB253), which requires companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions. The second law, Greenhouse Gases: Climate-Related Financial Risk, requires them to report any financial risks associated with climate change.
This article will help companies and supply chain partners affected by the new laws understand what is required for compliance, as well as any challenges associated with adhering to California’s latest climate disclosure laws.
The Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) applies to large entities with revenue exceeding $1bn and either were formed in or operating in and around California. These entities will be required to compile and share annual reports regarding greenhouse gas emissions, which are classified into the following categories:
The data must be assured by a third-party provider and made available on a public digital platform in the interest of transparency. This will allow the data to be viewed and aggregated by both stakeholders and eco-conscious consumers.
Under SB 261, companies with an annual revenue over $500 million will be required to report on climate-related financial risk biennially. Subsidiaries need not submit a report if their parent companies have already done so on behalf of the group.
Climate-related financial risk has been defined in the new California law. Examples range from potential impacts on direct operations to financial market risks and overall economic health. For example, in California, where the increasing prevalence of wildfires is attributed to climate change, their impact not only on businesses but on the economy must be incorporated into disclosure reports (as well as what efforts are being made to mitigate climate-related risks).
Risk assessments must be framed in line with the guidance provided in the Task Force on Clited Financial Disclosures' 2017 report or any updates that are still to come. Alternatively, the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards are seen as being equivalent to the aforementioned report.
AB 1305 has also come into effect as of 1 January 2024 and requires companies to be transparent regarding their participation in the voluntary carbon market. This market consists of brokers that help companies purchase carbon emissions allowances (or ‘carbon credits’) and invest in carbon offset projects. However, efforts to regulate the market have been complicated by a lack of understanding as to what constitutes a high-quality carbon offset.
AB 1305 does not obligate companies to actively engage with the voluntary carbon market. Instead, it stipulates that those who do must disclose the full extent of their activities, including specific projects they are involved in and how much they are investing in reducing carbon emissions. AB 1305 also requires companies to provide information that backs up any claims related to carbon neutrality and net zero emissions. The aim is to curb instances of ‘greenwashing’ and provide stakeholders with accurate information about companies’ involvement in the voluntary carbon market.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is an environmental protection agency that will oversee the regulation and enforcement of the reporting program. Their work will help to flesh out more of the practical details regarding the implementation of new legislation, although companies can now begin preparing for compliance.
In terms of future penalties, violating SB 253 could incur fines of up to $500,000, although regulators currently recognise the difficulties of calculating Scope 3 emissions. Therefore, between 2027 and 2030, there will only be a penalty for failing to file reports. Fines of up to $50,000 will be levied against entities that fail to make their financial risk reports public, or if reports are deemed inadequate by CARB. Finally, companies that breach the terms of AB 1305 could be subject to civil enforcement actions, as well as a daily fine of up to $2,500 (with a maximum total penalty of $500,000).
Companies that must take heed of California’s climate disclosure laws include large, multinational corporations. Most of these companies were aware that this kind of reporting would ultimately be required, and have been preparing for the eventuality. In fact, many companies are already submitting voluntary reports to the CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project). Besides this, several of the affected multinational businesses are already subject to climate change-related reporting in jurisdictions like the EU - and this includes financial risk assessments.
California may not be the first in the world to require climate disclosures, but it’s currently ahead of most of the US (with the state itself being the 5th most powerful economy worldwide). The new laws are therefore expected to have global influence, and the rest of the US, which often relies on California as a testing ground for new policies, will likely introduce similar legislation.
The first deadlines are set for the beginning of 2026 - and only require companies to be compliant with Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Reports for Scope 3 emissions must be completed by 2027. From 2027 onward, Scope 3 emissions must be submitted within 180 days of disclosing Scope 1 and 2 emissions. 1st January 2026 is the deadline for SB 261 (risk) disclosure.
On the surface, the new California climate disclosure laws have the greatest impact on companies with annual revenue exceeding $1 bn - but the knock-on effect will impact their entire supply chains. By targeting large and powerful corporations, California is seeking to influence the entire business ecosystem surrounding them.
Businesses that may be impacted by the new laws, either directly or indirectly, must begin preparing imminently. It may well be that the smaller players, who have not been exposed to climate disclosure bills elsewhere in the world, will have the most work to do.
The first step will be developing a strong understanding of Greenhouse Gas Protocol standards, which also includes guidance on accounting for emissions. A valuable source of information is the website for the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which will help relevant organisations become fluent in how climate risks can be assessed within the context of financial markets.
Carbon accounting firms can help with data collection and the necessary preparation that comes before disclosure. Many of these firms have demonstrable experience in carbon accounting for specific industries. While Foods Connected may not specialise in carbon accounting, our software can be used to provide emissions analytics (including an analysis of Class 3 emissions) with a particular focus on the food and beverage industry.
Boards will have to consider which measures should be taken to ensure an efficient and effective compliance program. Qualifying businesses must engage with an independent assurance provider, as this is a requirement of SB 253. As a further step toward ensuring the accuracy of the data to be disclosed, companies may form disclosure committees to ensure rigorous reporting and compliant results.
Some of the specific procedures governing California’s climate disclosure bills are still being formulated by CARB. The public will be notified of proposed regulations during this process, and commentary from interested and affected parties can be referred for consideration. Participation in the process will not only keep companies updated as to progress but allow them to play a more active role in the formulation of regulations.
Some of the specific procedures governing California’s climate disclosure bills are still being formulated by CARB. The public will be notified of proposed regulations during this process, and commentary from interested and affected parties can be referred for consideration. Participation in the process will not only keep companies updated as to progress but allow them to play a more active role in the formulation of regulations.
Foods Connected is committed to helping organisations in the food and beverage industry keep their CSR initiatives on track with data-driven insights. Interested in how our software can help you accurately report on CSR - including your efforts to actively reduce carbon emissions? Download our FREE CSR and Sustainability whitepaper or request a demo of our CSR and sustainability management software today.
This blog post is not legal advice for your company to use in complying with US legislation like the Californian Climate Disclosure Laws. Instead, it provides background information to help you better understand them. This legal information is not the same as legal advice, where an attorney applies the law to your specific circumstances, so we insist that you consult an attorney if you’d like advice on your interpretation of this information or its accuracy.